Acronis Installation Was Interrupted Echo

A COUNTRY (NOT COUNTRY) WITHOUT DECORATION

"Our war against Japan"

Di Filippo Giannini

"The Moment" was a newspaper that was born after the war. On the issue of November 7, 1945, on Armistice signed by Italy, we read: If the terms of the stipulations of September did not meet the hopes that had been made flash, our current state contradicts and denies promises much higher, far more solemn commitments. Ignores all the principles of war of the United Nations: tramples the "Atlantic Charter" (have you heard more? NDA), is a mockery of the twelve points recently announced by Truman, is the denial and the violent overthrow of all justice. Last summer, from Potsdam, Italy was promised peace for the early autumn. We are in autumn, and Italy still groaning under the weight of an armistice overwhelming. And peace, a peace not imposed but negotiated, it is far away. That at least gives you the "status" temporary interim invoked once by Parri because Italy can begin to live, move, breathe, because that country no longer feels that twenty-six months ago allies pinned and bound and chained mercilessly - calling this release.
Should I make a comment to this plore of people who have tried what, then, they have got? The scorn of those who imposed a brutal occupation, making it appear as a "liberation." Why do I now? Why are we still, after more than 60 (say sixty) years, nothing is cambiato, almeno negli effetti. Infatti il mortificante armistizio del settembre 1943 è ancora operante. Un giornale di quel periodo lamentava: Rinuncia a ogni sovranità politica e militare; controllo su tutti i settori della vita finanziaria ed economica ecc.. Da questo scritto, ripeto, vecchio di oltre sessant’anni, cosa è cambiato?
Ancora oggi dobbiamo pagare le forze di occupazione, sottostare alle requisizioni, combattere le loro guerre, che tali sono anche se etichettate “missioni di pace”.
Fra le tante “maramaldate” voglio ricordarne una ignorata dalla maggior parte degli italiani, e agli italiani voglio lanciare un monito: “Non andate in Giappone, perché potrebbero pick you up and close in a concentration camp. " Why? It 's simple and, recalling the cesspool in which we were rushed, I use one of my previous posting titled: THE TIME OF

Jene

Pietro Nenni, participating in a "historic" Council of Ministers in July 1945, so remember in his diary: At the Council session on Thursday is the issue of war on Japan and this time it or lump it. I drank. Making the most expressed reservations about the circumstances in which the country has been engaged in the war, but recognizing that the present state of things we could not do the machine back. De Gasperi sent a note from the American Secretary Foreign Grew, referred to here is the essential: the declaration of war will be welcomed in America, British and Soviet governments do not object.
After pointing out that ministers, government officials and politicians, were all more or less "interventionist", Nenni always in his diary, he concludes: As things stand it's difficult to go back without being exposed to the risk of a tightening of relations with the United States. But where is democracy when a government declares a war, albeit symbolic, to please a foreign government?.
Good question, right? But let's move on. The government
Parri (Head of resistance), the successor to those Badoglio Bonomi and, found, in less than six months, the time and how to get back on war, Italy. Despite being the leader of a country destroyed and weakened by five years of devastating conflict, Ferruccio Parri wanted to start again July 14, 1945, declared war on Japan, a country already defeated and with which, legally, we were still allies.
Giano Accame label so the initiative: The infamy of that decision maramaldesca against a people with whom we had no reason to contrast (more than stab in the back of France in 1940!,) Was signed by all parties who accused Fascism for having taken Italy into the war (...) Following dell’atto di guerra, non ci furono fra italiani e giapponesi - ripeto, sino a prova contraria ancora nostri alleati - scontri armati, né battaglie memorabili, solo perché pochi giorni dopo le due bombe di Hiroshima e Nagasaki risolsero la questione nell’american way.
Non mi risulta che con il Paese del “Sol Levante” sia stato firmato alcun trattato di pace, quindi dovremmo ancora essere in stato di guerra col Giappone.
E allora? Abbasso tutte le guerre? Non esageriamo, ci rispondono i paladini resistenziali firmatari del Trattato di pace del 1947: abbasso tutte le guerre, ma non quelle “giuste”, quelle, per intenderci, volute dai “liberatori”.
Ma l’italiano is an intelligent people, do not fall for this trappoletta: "Dear paisà, cà nisciuno is a fool, not an Italian, will go to Afghanistan, Iraq, and so on, the Italian is not" dawg "is" smart "understand "Paisan"?
So, dear readers, when you hear the "war bulletins", sorry for the slip, I meant the "Bulletin of Peace" from those countries in the Middle East, announcing the death or wounding of some Italian soldier, do not give Listening: "It 'sinister Nazi-fascist propaganda aimed at undermining democracy and freedom." How far is
that time (but had gone only a handful of years) where they came from every where economists and politicians to study the "phenomenon of fascism," and his boss there was the envy of the world. They murdered and hanged by the feet: the only way to return Italy to the 'geographical expression. "



PS After seeing how enthusiastically it was received in Berlin Barrack Osama, I think even the best of Italy is not Germany.
Poor Europe!

How Many Calories In A Omelette

LETTER (WHICH WILL NOT 'COME) TO BE BELFIORE

If any readers know the student Sara Belfiore, is asked to warn that "there is a place for her."
Filippo Giannini

Qualche giorno fa un mio caro amico mi chiamò da una città del nord invitandomi a consultare il sito dell’On. Giulietto Chiesa Troverai qualcosa di interessante, mi disse. Curioso come sono, seguii le indicazioni del mio amico ed aprii il sito indicato. Ho trovato una lettera della studentessa Sara Belfiore, la quale, fra l’altro così scrive all’On. Giulietto Chiesa: Le scrivo per porle una domanda e dei chiarimenti sul famigerato (sic!) Pansa (…).
L’On. Giulietto Chiesa, fra l’altro, così risponde: Il detto Pansa è uno degli esempi più precisi di intellettuali al servizio del potere e della reazione (è ancora in agguato? nda). La sua esecrabile (!) activities is to contribute consistently to the demolition of the foundations of the democratic state born of the Resistance (...). His credibility is zero (...).
premise that we are not talking about what we learned in high school physics classes, where the resistance is equal to the voltage divided by the intensity, but of something more serious, and that is that resistance which, as rightly wrote Hon. Giulietto Church, is the foundation of this democratic state.
I have read only one book of Pansa (henceforth referred to as the "notorious"), because of what he wrote I knew as a boy, though, of course, not all cases handled by the "notorious".
am fully aware that poor Sara Belfiore can not read what I write, because my chances of communication are nothing compared to those available to the Hon. Church. However I will try to treat the subject from my point of view, with, as I always do, of documents.
To begin I would like to invite Sara Belfiore to view photos of the "show" of "bodies hanging" in Piazzale Loreto in Milan, taken that day in late April 1945 may already understand this and give a response to the requested Hon. Giulietto Church.
To understand the phenomenon of "partisan" It should be noted that determination at a time when it operated, the laws of war, the laws operating for decades. This described (Summarize the most demanding) what were the qualifications to be declared "lawful combatant": 1) carry arms openly, 2) wear a uniform known by the enemy, 3) depend on the responsible official, 4) acknowledge the laws of war . The "partisan" did not have any of these qualifications, then (and still are the conventions of war then in force to establish it) did not have the qualifications to operate against the enemy. Again the agreement provided that, if captured, could be passed immediately to the weapons. Not only that, but always mentioned Convention provides that the army would have benefited from the offended "right of retaliation."
What did the "notorious" so serious as to be so abused by the Hon. Giulietto Church? Again, I've only read a volume of the "infamous", which has treated some cases of partisans who killed, the war is over, "these alleged fascist or" how many other untreated cases occurred between 1945 and 1948 and beyond?
I remember that after the war some circles claimed that the "executed", men, women and children (yes, even children), were over 300 thousand cases. In a statement, the Chamber of Deputies that, during a session, Hon. Selvaggi addressed to the Minister of the Interior to clarify how many fascists were killed by partisans after the war ended. He rose imperiously Hon. Scotti of the PCI and, interrupting the minister, he shouted: three hundred thousand, we have killed us and we did well!. I believe that this figure is exaggerated, in fact, Giorgio Pisano in his research and put it between 95 and 100 thousand.
The Historical Institute of CSR to Terranova Bracciolini has published two volumes (first and second editions), in which the riportatati names and, where possible, the places where the "fascists or alleged these were executed." Well in the first edition are the names of fifty cases, another five are reported in the second edition. But I was assured that the investigations continue, because they are far from exhausted.
In reply letter of Hon. Giulietto Church there is also an observation carried forward: His (the one of the "notorious", note) has been and is to introduce in the usual sense of the Italians without memory, the idea that the partisans were all murderers and that ' army of Salo (?) was composed of good guys who also had their ideals (...). Note: Do not know if "they were all good guys," some of these will also stolen jam, but one thing is indisputable that even the Hon. Giulietto Church can ignore, namely that the choice was absolutely perfect, because consciously chose to side with the loser, and that most of these were volunteers, started with the intent to fight the foreigner, whatever it was. It would emphasize: this was the only intent, not really to fight other brothers were this and only this, first, to strike and kill or ambush behind the "boys of Salò." I urge the good Sara Belfiore (if it could read) to examine what he has written the "fascist-antifascist" Giorgio Bocca, in his book "History Italy partisan "(The Partisan) investigate any injury, punishment, retaliation for involving uncertain, to dig the pit of hatred (...). Or in the book "7 th Gap" by Mario De Micheli: <(I partigiani) dovevano combattere in mezzo all’avversario, mescolandosi ad esso, conoscerne le abitudini e colpirlo quando meno se lo aspetta: Portare la morte a casa del nemico era insomma la direttiva con cui sorgevano i Gap (…).
Dear Sara Belfiore, as you see, you have ample opportunity to read.
conclude with the admonition of Heraclitus: You'll never find the truth if you're not willing to accept what you do not expect.