If any readers know the student Sara Belfiore, is asked to warn that "there is a place for her."
Filippo Giannini
Qualche giorno fa un mio caro amico mi chiamò da una città del nord invitandomi a consultare il sito dell’On. Giulietto Chiesa Troverai qualcosa di interessante, mi disse. Curioso come sono, seguii le indicazioni del mio amico ed aprii il sito indicato. Ho trovato una lettera della studentessa Sara Belfiore, la quale, fra l’altro così scrive all’On. Giulietto Chiesa: Le scrivo per porle una domanda e dei chiarimenti sul famigerato (sic!) Pansa (…).
L’On. Giulietto Chiesa, fra l’altro, così risponde: Il detto Pansa è uno degli esempi più precisi di intellettuali al servizio del potere e della reazione (è ancora in agguato? nda). La sua esecrabile (!) activities is to contribute consistently to the demolition of the foundations of the democratic state born of the Resistance (...). His credibility is zero (...).
premise that we are not talking about what we learned in high school physics classes, where the resistance is equal to the voltage divided by the intensity, but of something more serious, and that is that resistance which, as rightly wrote Hon. Giulietto Church, is the foundation of this democratic state.
I have read only one book of Pansa (henceforth referred to as the "notorious"), because of what he wrote I knew as a boy, though, of course, not all cases handled by the "notorious".
am fully aware that poor Sara Belfiore can not read what I write, because my chances of communication are nothing compared to those available to the Hon. Church. However I will try to treat the subject from my point of view, with, as I always do, of documents.
To begin I would like to invite Sara Belfiore to view photos of the "show" of "bodies hanging" in Piazzale Loreto in Milan, taken that day in late April 1945 may already understand this and give a response to the requested Hon. Giulietto Church.
To understand the phenomenon of "partisan" It should be noted that determination at a time when it operated, the laws of war, the laws operating for decades. This described (Summarize the most demanding) what were the qualifications to be declared "lawful combatant": 1) carry arms openly, 2) wear a uniform known by the enemy, 3) depend on the responsible official, 4) acknowledge the laws of war . The "partisan" did not have any of these qualifications, then (and still are the conventions of war then in force to establish it) did not have the qualifications to operate against the enemy. Again the agreement provided that, if captured, could be passed immediately to the weapons. Not only that, but always mentioned Convention provides that the army would have benefited from the offended "right of retaliation."
What did the "notorious" so serious as to be so abused by the Hon. Giulietto Church? Again, I've only read a volume of the "infamous", which has treated some cases of partisans who killed, the war is over, "these alleged fascist or" how many other untreated cases occurred between 1945 and 1948 and beyond?
I remember that after the war some circles claimed that the "executed", men, women and children (yes, even children), were over 300 thousand cases. In a statement, the Chamber of Deputies that, during a session, Hon. Selvaggi addressed to the Minister of the Interior to clarify how many fascists were killed by partisans after the war ended. He rose imperiously Hon. Scotti of the PCI and, interrupting the minister, he shouted: three hundred thousand, we have killed us and we did well!. I believe that this figure is exaggerated, in fact, Giorgio Pisano in his research and put it between 95 and 100 thousand.
The Historical Institute of CSR to Terranova Bracciolini has published two volumes (first and second editions), in which the riportatati names and, where possible, the places where the "fascists or alleged these were executed." Well in the first edition are the names of fifty cases, another five are reported in the second edition. But I was assured that the investigations continue, because they are far from exhausted.
In reply letter of Hon. Giulietto Church there is also an observation carried forward: His (the one of the "notorious", note) has been and is to introduce in the usual sense of the Italians without memory, the idea that the partisans were all murderers and that ' army of Salo (?) was composed of good guys who also had their ideals (...). Note: Do not know if "they were all good guys," some of these will also stolen jam, but one thing is indisputable that even the Hon. Giulietto Church can ignore, namely that the choice was absolutely perfect, because consciously chose to side with the loser, and that most of these were volunteers, started with the intent to fight the foreigner, whatever it was. It would emphasize: this was the only intent, not really to fight other brothers were this and only this, first, to strike and kill or ambush behind the "boys of Salò." I urge the good Sara Belfiore (if it could read) to examine what he has written the "fascist-antifascist" Giorgio Bocca, in his book "History Italy partisan "(The Partisan) investigate any injury, punishment, retaliation for involving uncertain, to dig the pit of hatred (...). Or in the book "7 th Gap" by Mario De Micheli: <(I partigiani) dovevano combattere in mezzo all’avversario, mescolandosi ad esso, conoscerne le abitudini e colpirlo quando meno se lo aspetta: Portare la morte a casa del nemico era insomma la direttiva con cui sorgevano i Gap (…).
Dear Sara Belfiore, as you see, you have ample opportunity to read.
conclude with the admonition of Heraclitus: You'll never find the truth if you're not willing to accept what you do not expect.
0 comments:
Post a Comment